Thursday, October 2, 2008

Fakta menarik untuk dikongsi bersama...

Mini tesis ini ditulis oleh seorang pengkaji sejarah, bernama Michael Chick. Walaupun saya tidak mengenali beliau dan beliau mungkin tidak mahu dikenali, saya mendapati tulisannya mempunyai logik yang munasabah untuk dikongsi bersama. Beginilah tulisannya berbunyi...
"It has been interesting to read such free-flowing comments on an all “Malaysian” free for all. I hate race classifications and here’s why….

How many of you have read the book entitled “Contesting Malayness - Malay Identity Across Boundaries” (edited by Timothy P. Barnard & published by Singapore University Press)? It reflects the Anthropologists views that there is no such race as the “Malays” to begin with.

If we follow the original migration of the Southern Chinese of 6,000 years ago, they moved into Taiwan, (now the Alisan), then into the Phillipines (now the Aeta) and moved into Borneo (4,500 years ago) (Dayak). They also split into Sulawesi and progressed into Jawa, and Sumatera. The final migration was to the Malayan Peninsular 3,000 years ago. A sub-group from Borneo also moved to Champa in Vietnam at 4,500 years ago.

Interestingly, the Champa deviant group moved back to present day Kelantan. There are also traces of the Dong Song and HoaBinh migration from Vietnam and Cambodia. To confuse the issue, there was also the Southern Thai migration, from what we know as Pattani today.

Of course, we also have the Minangkabau’s which come from the descendants of Alexander the Great and a West Indian Princess. (Sejarah Melayu page 1-3)

So the million dollar question… Is there really a race called the “Malays”? All anthropologists DO NOT SEEM TO THINK SO.

Neither do the “Malays” who live on the West Coast of Johor. They’d rather be called Javanese. What about the west coast Kedah inhabitants who prefer to be known as “Achenese” or the Ibans who simply want to be known as Ibans? Try calling a Kelabit “Malay” and see what response you get – you will be so glad that their Head-Hunting days are over.

Who are the Malays? In an article in the Star paper, this is what they said (an excerpt is reproduced here below):

“The Malays – taken as an aggregation of people of different ethnic backgrounds but who speak the same language or family of languages and share common cultural and traditional ties – are essentially a new race, compared to the Chinese, Indians and the Arabs with their long histories of quests and conquests.

The Malay nation, therefore, covers people of various ethnic stock, including Javanese, Bugis, Bawean, Achehnese, Thai, orang asli, the indigenous people of Sabah and Sarawak and descendants of Indian Muslims who had married local women.

Beneath these variations, however, there is a common steely core that is bent on changing the Malay persona from its perceived lethargic character to one that is brave, bold and ready to take on the world.”

The definition of “Malay” is therefore simply a collection of people who speak a similar type language. With what is meant by a similar type language does not mean that the words are similar. Linguists call this the “Lego-type” language, where words are added on to the root word to make meaning and give tenses and such. Somehow, the Indonesians disagree with this classification and insist on being called “Indonesians” even though the majority of “Malays” have their roots in parts of Indonesia?

They refuse to be called “Malay” no matter how you may define it.

The “Malay” definition also includes the Champa, Dong Song, HoabinHian, Taiwanese Alisan and Philippine Aetas. The “Orang Asli” are (for lack of a better term) are ex-Africans. If you try to call any one of our East Malaysian brothers an “Orang Asli”, they will beat you up! I had to repeat this because almost all West Malaysians make the same mistake when we cross the South China Sea. Worse, somehow, they feel even more insulted when you call them “Malay”. Somehow, “kurang ajar” is uttered below their breath as if “Malay” was a really bad word for them. I’m still trying to figure this one out.

Watch “Malays in Africa”; a Museum Negara produced DVD and also, the “Champa Malays” by the same. With this classification, they must also include the Filipinos, the Papua New Guineans, Australian Aborigines, as well as the Polynesian Aborigines. These are of the Australo Melanesians who migrated out of Africa 60,000 years ago.

Getting interesting? Read on…

The “Malay” should also include the Taiwanese singer “Ah Mei” who is Alisan as her tribe is the ancestors of the “Malays” and you will need to define the Southern Chinese (Southern Province) as Malay also since they are from the same stock 6,000 years ago.

Try calling the Bugis “Malay”. Interestingly, the Bugis who predominantly live on Sulawesi, are not even Indonesians. Neither do they fall into the same group as the migrating Southern Chinese of 6,000 years ago nor the Australo Melanesian group from Africa. Ready for this?

The Bugis are the cross-breed between the Mongolian Chinese and the wandering Arab Pirates (a runaway Ming Dynasty official whom Cheng Ho was sent to hunt down). Interestingly, the Bugis were career Pirates in the Johor-Riau Island areas and the nephew of Daeng Kemboja was appointed the First Sultan of Selangor. That makes the entire Selangor Sultanate part Arab, part Chinese! Try talking to the Bugis Museum curator near Kukup in Johor - Kukup is located near the most south-western tip of Johor.

Let’s not even get into the Hang Tuah, Hang Jebat, Hang Kasturi, Hang Lekiu, and Hang Lekir, who shared the same family last name as the other super famous “Hang” family member - Hang Li Poh and who was she? Legend tells us that she is the princess of a Ming Dynasty Emperor who was sent to marry the Sultan of Malacca. Won’t that make the entire Malacca Sultanate down line “Baba”? Since the older son of the collapsed Malaccan Sultanate got killed in Johor, (the current Sultanate is the down line of the then Bendahara) the only other son became the Sultan of Perak.

But wait a minute, that is what the legend says.

Let’s look at the proof - the solid evidence. There is a well next to the Zheng He Temple in Malacca which is supposed to be the well built by the Sultan of Malacca for her. According to legend, anyone who drinks of it shall re-visit Malacca before they die. Hmmm smells like a romantic fairy tale but let us look at who Hang Li Poh actually is. Which Ming Emperor was she a daughter to? So I got into researching the entire list of Ming Emperors. Guess what? Not a single Ming Emperor’s last name begins with Hang. In fact, all their last names begin with Tzu (pronounced Choo). So who is Hang Li Poh? An Extra Concubine? A Spare Handmaiden? Who knows? But one thing for certain, is that she was no daughter of any of the Ming Emperors. Gone is the romantic notion of the Sultan of Malacca marrying an exotic Chinese Princess. Sorry guys, the Sultan married an unidentified Chinese commoner.

Next question…

If the Baba’s are part Malay, why have they been marginalized by not being bumiputera? Which part of “Malay” are they not? Whatever the answer, why then are the Portuguese of Malacca bumiputera? Did they not come 100 years AFTER the arrival of the first Baba’s? Parameswara founded Malacca in 1411, the Portuguese came in 1511, and the Dutch in the 1600’s. Strangely, the Baba’s were in fact once classified a Bumiputera, but some Prime Minister decreed that they were to be strangely “declassified” in the 1960’s. Why? How can a “native son of the soil” degenerate into an “un-son”? The new classification is “pendatang” meaning a migrant.

Wait a minute, isn’t everyone on the Peninsular a migrant to begin with?

The Sultan of Kelantan had similar roots to the Pattani Kingdom making him of Thai origin. And what is this “coffee table book” by the Sultan of Perlis claiming to be the direct descendant of the prophet Muhammed? Somehow we see Prof Khoo Khay Khim’s signature name on the book. I’ll pay good money to own a copy of it myself. Anyone has a spare?

In pursuing this thread, and having looked at the history of Prophet Muhammed (BTW, real name Ahmad) we could not figure out which descendant line the Sultan of Perlis was. Perhaps it was by the name Syed, which transcended. Then we would ask which of the 13 official wives named in the Holy Koran? or was he a descendant from the other 23 names of the non-wives? Of the 13 were (at least known), there are 3 Israeli women. Then you would also ask yourself, isn’t Prophet Muhammad an Israeli himself? The answer is clear. All descendants of Moses are Israeli. In fact, the Holy Koran teaches that Moses was the First Muslim. Thus confirming that all descendants to be Israeli, including Jesus and Prophet Muhammad. It is also found in Sura 2:58 & 59 which specifically mentions that the Torah and the Kitab (Bible) are Holy Words of Allah. But since this is not a religious discussion, let’s move on to a more anthropological approach.

So, how many of you have met with orang Asli?

The more northern you go, the more African they look. Why are they called Negrito? It is a Spanish word, from which directly translates “mini Negros”. The more southern you go, the more “Indonesian” they look. And the ones who live at Cameron Highlands kinda look 50-50. You can see the Batek at Taman Negara, who really looks like Eddie Murphy to a certain degree or the Negritos who live at the Thai border near Temenggor Lake (north Perak). The Mah Meri in Carrie Island looks almost like the Jakuns in Endau Rompin - half African, half Indonesian.

By definition, (this is super eye-opening) there was a Hindu Malay Empire in Kedah.

Yes, I said right - the Malays were Hindu and it was, by the old name Langkasuka. Today it is known as Lembah Bujang. This Hindu Malay Empire was 2,000 years old - pre-dating Borobudur and Angkor Watt who came about around 500-600 years later. Lembah Bujang was THE mighty trading empire, and its biggest influence was by the Indians who were here to help start it. By definition, this should make the Indians bumiputeras too since they were here 2,000 years ago! Why are they marginalized?

Of the 3 books listed, “Contesting Malayness” (about S$32 for soft cover) is “banned” in Malaysia; you will need to “smuggle” it into Malaysia; for very obvious reasons or read it in Singapore if you don’t feel like breaking the law.

The other, “Kingdoms of the Indonesian Archipelago and the Malay Peninsular” (about RM84) are openly sold at all leading bookshops. You should be able to find a fair bit of what I’ve been quoting in this book too, but mind you, it is very heavy reading material, and you will struggle through the initial 200+ pages. It is extremely technical in nature. Maybe that’s why it wasn’t banned (yet) because our authorities couldn’t make head or tail of it? (if I wasn’t doing research for my film, I wouldn’t have read it in its entirety)

The final one is the “Sejarah Melayu” (about RM 35) is available at the University Malaya bookshop and I have both the English and Royal Malay version published by MBRAS. Incidentally, the Professor (Author) was invited to speak on this very subject about 2 years ago, in KL, invited by the MBRAS. You can imagine the “chaos” this seminar created.

There were actually many sources for these findings. Any older Philippino Museum Journal also carries these migration stories. This migration is also on display at the Philippines National Museum in Luzon. However, they end with the Aeta, and only briefly mention that the migration continued to Indonesia and Malaysia, but fully acknowledge that all Filipinos came from Taiwan and before Taiwan, was from China.

There is another book (part of a series) called the “Archipelago Series” endorsed by Tun Mahatir and Marina Mohammad, which states the very same thing right at the introduction on page one:-

“… that the Malays migrated out of Southern China some 6,000 years ago…”.

I believe it is called the “Pre-History of Malaysia” Hard Cover, about RM99 found in (mostly) MPH. They also carry “Pre-History of Indonesia” by the same authors for the same price.

It is most interesting to note that our Museum officials invented brand new unheard-of terms such as “Proto-Malay” and “Deutero-Malay”, to replace the accepted Scientific Term, Australo-Melanesians (African descent) and Austronesians (Chinese Descent, or Mongoloid to be precise) in keeping in line with creating this new “Malay” term.. They also created the new term called the Melayu-Polynesian. (Which “Melayu” exists in the Polynesian Islands?) Maybe they were just trying to be “patriotic” and “nationalistic” - who knows? After all, we also invented the term, “Malaysian Time” when the rest of the world calls it “tardy” and “late”. It’s quite an embarrassment actually - Singaporeans crossing the border are asked to set their watches back by about 100 years, to adjust to “Malaysian Time”

In a nutshell, the British Colonial Masters, who, for lack of a better description, needed a “blanket” category for ease of classification, used the term “Malay”. The only other logical explanation, which I have heard, was that “Malaya” came as a derivative of “Himalaya”, where at Langkasuka, or Lembah Bujang today was where the Indians were describing the locals as “Malai” which means “Hill People” in Tamil. This made perfect sense as the focal point at that time was at Gunung Jerai, and the entire Peninsular had a “Mountain Range” “Banjaran Titiwangsa”, as we call it.

The Mandarin and Cantonese accurately maintain the accurate pronunciation of “Malai Ren” and “Malai Yun” respectively till this very day where “ren” and “yun” both mean “peoples”.

Interestingly, “Kadar” and “Kidara”, Hindi and Sanskrit words accurately describe “Kedah” of today. They both mean “fertile Land for Rice cultivation. Again, a name given by the Indians 2,000 years ago during the “Golden Hindu Era” for a duration of 1,500 years.

It was during the “Golden Hindu Era” that the new term which the Hindu Malay leaders also adopted the titles, “Sultan” and “Raja”. The Malay Royalty was Hindu at that time, as all of Southeast Asia was under strong Indian influence, including Borobudur and Angkor Watt. Bali today still practices devout Hindu beliefs. The snake amulet worn by the Sultans of today, The Royal Dias, and even the “Pelamin” for weddings are tell-tale signs of these strong Indian influences. So, it was not Parameswara who was the first Sultan in Malaya. Sultanate existed approximately 1,500 years before he set foot on the Peninsular during the “Golden Hindu Era” of Malaysia and they were all Hindu.

The book “Pre history of Malaysia” also talks about the “Lost Kingdom” of the “Chi-Tu” where the local Malay Kingdom was Buddhists. The rest of the “Malays” were Animistic Pagans but you may say that the “Sejarah Melayu” calls it “Melayu”? Yes, it does. Read it again; is it trying to describe the 200-odd population hamlet near Palembang by the name “Melayu”? (Google Earth will show this village).

By that same definition, then, the Acehnese should be considered a “race”. So should the Bugis and the Bataks to be fair. Orang Acheh, Orang Bugis, Orang Laut, Orang Melayu now mean the same descriptions of ethnic tribes, at best. And since the “Malays” of today are not all descendants of the “Melayu” kampung in Jambi (if I remember correctly), the term Melayu has been wrongly termed from day one. Maybe this is why the Johoreans still call themselves either Bugis, or Javanese until today. So do the Acehnese on the West coast of Kedah & Perlis and the Kelantanese insist that they came from Champa, Vietnam.

Moreover, the fact that the first 3 pages claiming that “Melayu” comes from Alexander the Great and the West Indian Princess doesn’t help. More importantly, it was written in 1623. By then, the Indians had been calling the locals “Malai” for 1,500 yrs already. So the name stuck.

And with the Sejarah Melayu (The Malay Annals in page 1-3) naming the grandson of Iskandar Zulkarnain, and the West Indian Princess forming the Minangkabau. Whenever a Malay is asked about it, he usually says it is “karut” (bullshit), but all Malayan based historians insist on using Sejarah Melayu as THE main reference book for which “Malay” history is based upon. The only other books are “Misa Melayu”, “Hikayat Merong Mahawangsa”, and “Hikayat Hang Tuah” which is of another long and sometimes “heated” discussion. I find this strange.

I also find that it is strange that the “Chitti’s” (Indian+ Malay) of Malacca are categorized as Bumiputera, while their Baba brothers are not. Why? Both existed during the Parameswara days. Which part of the “Malay” side of the Baba is not good enough for Bumiputera classification? Re-instate them. They used to be Bumiputera pre 1960’s anyway.

Instead of “Malay”, I believe that “Maphilindo” (circa 1963) would have been the closest in accurately trying to describe the Malays. However, going by that definition, it should most accurately be “MaphilindoThaiChinDiaVietWanGreekCamfrica” and it is because of this even our University Malaya Anthropology professors cannot look at you in the eye and truthfully say that the word “Malay” technically and accurately defines a race.

This is most unfortunate.

So, in a nutshell, the “Malays” (anthropologists will disagree with this “race” definition) are truly Asia! For once the Tourism Ministry got it right. We should stop calling this country “Tanah Melayu” instead call it, “Tanah Truly Asia”.

You must understand now, why I was “tickled pink” when I found out that the Visit Malaysia slogan for 2007 was “Truly Asia”. They are so correct (even though they missed out Greece and Africa). By the way the name UMNO should be changed to UTANO the new official acronym for “United Truly Asia National Organization”. After all, they started out as a Bugis club in Johor anyway.

As I said, I hate race classifications. This is so depressing and even more depressing is that the “Malays” are not even a race; not since day one.

“Truly Asia Boleh”

Kita mempunyai akal fikiran sendiri untuk berfikir, mengapa perlu ada sikap berpuak-puak dalam masyarakat Malaysia, kenapa orang Bumiputera takut untuk bersaing dengan bukan Bumiputera? Sekiranya kerajaan ingin melindungi puak pribumi, mereka yang benar-benar layak ialah kaum Asli negara ini seperti orang Penan, Negrito, Sakai, Jakun dan lain-lain, merekalah kaum Bumiputera bukannya seperti yang termaktub dalam perlembagaan hari ini.

12 comments:

kijangmas said...

This "Chick" character said:-

"The Sultan of Kelantan had similar roots to the Pattani Kingdom making him of Thai origin."

This statement is enough to show the utter ignorance and intellectual deficiency of this guy.

Listen people, the Patani Kingdom (today's Thai changwats of Pattani, Yala, Narathiwat and the amphurs of Chana, Thepha, Sabayoi and Na Thawi in changwat Songkhla) was MALAY and the inhabitants of this Thai-held region are today still 85% ethnic-MALAYS. "Thai" is a recent concoction by Field Marshall Phibun Songkhram thru his "Thai Ratthaniyom" policy of 1932 in his attempt to assimilate all non-T'ai/Siamese inhabitants of Siam into the T'ai yoke.

For this delusional scribe to allude that the Kelantan Sultan is "of Thai origin" via his reasoning that the Sultan's "Pattani roots" infer a "Thai origin" just because Pattani today is ruled by Bangkok (actually only after the 1902 annexation by Siam) exposed his total lack of comprehension of Malay Peninsular history and ethnography.

Go understand Patani History

Awang said...

Apa yang pasti ialah hanya orang
Melayu Islam = Melayu
Melayu bukan Islam = bukan Melayu
Thai Islam = Melayu
Thai bukan Islam = Thai/ Siam

Orang Patani ialah orang Siam yang memeluk Islam sepertimana orang Melayu Hindu dulu yang memeluk Islam. Mereka seagama, sering berhubung, berkahwin dan beranak pinak dan mengakui mereka Malayu dan mengkafirkan mereka sama ada Melayu Hindu atau Siam Hindu/Buddha yang bukan Islam. maka lahirlah Melayu baru yang hanya dikatakan Melayu sekiranya mereka Islam.

The Author said...

Orang "Siam" itu orang apa dlm segi anthropologi?

Adakah puak T'ai Lanna (Chiengmai) dan puak T'ai Isaan (Laos) dan puak T'ai Korat (dekat Kemboja) dan puak T'ai Kung Thep (Bangkok) orang "Siam" dan sama dengan orang Melayu Patani?

Sebelum Negara Patani Darussalam di takluk oleh Chulalongkorn (Rama V) dlm tahun 1902, orang Patani ni orang apa? "Siam" atau Melayu?

Orang Kelantan -- Husam Musa, Ibrahim Ali, Tuan Guru Nik Aziz -- orang Siam juga? Mereka semua ada keluarga di Patani.

Jadi siapa "Siam" siapa Melayu?

Anonymous said...

Siam yang memeluk Islam tidak lagi mengaku mereka Siam...mereka ialah Bumiputera Melayu yang dapat menikmati semua kemudahan daripada kerajaan. Bolehkan Bumiputera Siam menikmati apa yang Bumiputera Melayu perolehi selama ini? Sanggupkah mereka mengaku mereka Siam? Kalau Siam bolehkah orang Siam beli tanah rezab Melayu?

Anonymous said...

Dear Awang,
Two days ago, I saw NatGeo's docu on "Chinatown" across the world. It should be an eye opener especially to Chinese in M'sia to see how badly discriminated they were by the Caucassians whom Chinese here revere.One 80 year old couple born and bred in the US couldn't even buy a house because they were Chinese until only recently! You wouldn't find such a thing happening here. There is no one race above the other, that is what the Prophet Muhammad taught. As a matter of fact, if the blog 'Empayar Benua Siam Islam Nagara Kedah' is to be believed, which I personally find very credible, the Malays experienced ethnic cleansing at the hands of the Thais who coveted our glorious Ayyuthaic kingdom, hence all the confusion in our history.

Thank you.

Awang said...

Kita tidak perlu menyalahkan sesiapa kerana kejahilan, manusia yang jahil hanya menunggu karma yang memang akan melaknatkan mereka. Lihat saja orang Melayu hari ini, di manakah kedudukan mereka walaupun mendapat subsidi, mendapat diskaun beli rumah, ada tanah rezab Melayu, ada peluang kahwin 4, ada macam-macam bantuan kerajaan untuk mereka, biarkan si luncai terjun dengan labu-labunya, biarkan...
Sebenarnya pepatah 'takkan Melayu hilang di dunia" lebih sesuai untuk bukan Melayu...

Wan Solehah al-Halbani said...

Salam,

Melayu tidak penting, yang penting hanyalah Islam. Kalau bangsa Melayu tidak wujud di dunia ini pun tidak menjadi masalah kepada kita asalkan kita ini adalah Islam. Saya menyeru wahai bangsaku, jangan sibuk mengenai Melayu dan bangsa Melayu, jangan sibuk untuk mempertahankan asal usul Melayu, sejarah Melayu, ketamadunnan Melayu dan keagungan Melayu.

Sibukkanlah diri kita dgn asal usul kita sebagai orang-orang Islam, dgn sejarah Islam kita, ketamadunan Islam kita dan keagungan Islam kita.

Allah memerintahkan kita agar kita menyerang dan memerangi Singapura, Thailand, Filipina serta yang lain-lainnya agar seluruh negara kafir di dunia ini tunduk dan mengalah kpd sesebuah Negara Islam hatta kpd negara Islam Malaysia kita ini. Allah menghendaki agar kita memerintah dan berkuasa ke atas negara-negara kafir di dunia ini melalui Jihad dan Perang.

Sebelum kita menyerang Singapura, Filipina, Thailand dan negara-negara kafir yang lain, Allah memerintahkan kita agar terlebih dahulu menjadikan Malaysia kita ini sebagai sebuah Negara Islam melalui jihad, Perang dan Revolusi. Allah menghendaki agar orang-orang kafir di Malaysia kita ini dijadikan sebagai kaum Zimmi, iaitu rakyat kelas kedua yang tidak ada kuasa politik tetapi yang semata-mata dan hanya taat, patuh, hormat dan setia sahaja kpd kerajaan Islam.

Setelah Malaysia kita ini sempurna sebagai sebuah Negara Islam yang kuat, Allah memerintahkan kita agar kita menyerang Singapura, Thailand dan seluruh negara kafir yang lain agar mereka ini kesemuanya berada di bawah kekuasaan kita yang tunduk, mengalah, akur dan setia kpd kita.

Misi kita sebagai orang-orang Islam yang utama di dunia ini adalah untuk :

1. Menghapuskan kekuasaan kafir dpd berkuasa , berdaulat dan memerintah ke atas kita melalui Jihad, Perang dan Revolusi;

2. Menegakkan negara Islam yang akan menjalankan segala undang-undang Islam melalui Jihad, Perang dan Revolusi;

3. Menjadikan agama Islam sebagai agama yang berkuasa dan memerintah yang paling berkuasa di dunia yang tidak boleh ditandingi oleh sesiapapun melalui Jihad, Perang dan Revolusi.

Jihad,Perang dan Revolusi yang diperkatakan di sini adalah dalam bentuk yang OFENSIF, bukan DEFENSIF, iaitu untuk menyerang dan berperang tanpa terlebih kita ini diserang dan diperangi atau dizalimi dan disakiti oleh musuh-musuh kita.

Inilah keagungan Islam yang diperintahkan Allah ke atas kita untuk kita ciptakannya dgn Jihad, Perang dan Revolusi, dan Allah sekali-kali tidak memerintahkan agar kita menjadi golongan yang terkuat, berkuasa, agung dan hebat kerana Melayu, di atas nama Melayu dan untuk Melayu.

Islam adalah agama yang sempurna dpd Allah, yang pincang, lemah dan tidak sempurna adalah bangsa Melayu yang beragama Islam. Sempurnakanlah diri kita dgn taqwa, semangat dan akhlak dpd Allah bagi membolehkan kita untuk menyempurnakan segala perintah Allah.



Sekian, terima kasih.


Yang Tulus Ikhlas



Wan Solehah al-Halbani

Temerloh, PAHANG DM

Anonymous said...

Tiada yang lebih hebat lagi kalau kita bercakap pasal Tuhan. Semua orang anggap Tuhan mereka paling hebat dan Maha Berkuasa. Tetapi yang paling sedih ialah orang sanggup membunuh kerana Tuhan. Orang yang sanggup membunuh dengan apapun alasannya ialah orang yang patut mengejar lebih ilmu, belajarlah lagi, bacalah lagi ilmu-ilmu ketamadun dunia dan agama-agama lain. Hanya dengan ilmu manusia tak menjadi taksub, malah menghargai nyawa orang lain. Benci tak dapat dipadam dengan kebencian, Benci hanya dapat dipadam dengan kasih sayang...

Paiso Awang Zari said...

Salam,

Barat menjadi maju kerana mereka belajar dpd ketamaddunan Islam. Di atas muka bumi ini hanya wujud satu ketamaddunan sahaja, iaitu ketamaddunan Islam. Semua ketamaddunan yang lain dpd Islam adalah ciptaan manusia yang disifatkan Islam sebagai Jahiliyah. Segala ilmu dpd manusia yang pintar dan terdidik mengenai politik, ekonomi, sosial, moral dan perhubungan antarabangsa adalah disifatkan Islam sebagai hawa nafsu yang rosak dan pincang, ilmu yang sempurna dalam seluruh bidang kehidupan manusia hanyalah ilmu dpd Allah yang terkandung di dalam al-Quran, Sunnah dan Sirah.

Ketamaddunan Islam adalah dpd Allah dan Rasul-Nya yang diwujudkan di bumi kita ini melalui Jihad dan Perang. Allah memerintahkan umat Islam supaya meruntuhkan kekuatan dan kekuasaan kafir melalui Jihad dan Perang supaya kita dapat menghapuskan ketamaddunan manusia dan untuk menegakkan kekuasaan Islam yang akan mewujudkan ketamaddunan Islam agar seluruh umat manusia di bumi, Islam mahupun bukan Islam, dapat mengecapi nikmat sistem kehidupan Islam di bawah ketamaddunan Islam.

Islam tidak memaksa orang-orang kafir supaya mereka memasuki ke dalam agama Islam, tetapi Islam memaksa mereka dgn Jihad dan Perang supaya mereka menerima Negara Islam supaya mereka dapat menikmati sistem kehidupan Islam.

Sekian, terima kasih.


Wan Solehah al-Halbani

Anonymous said...

Memang tak salah kita hidup bertuhan, tetapi tuhan mana yang mahu penganutnya sahaja hidup manakala bukan penganutnya boleh mampus...Kalau Tuhan Maha Berkuasa, biarlah yang kafir masuk neraka, biarlah tuhan yang membuat keputusan tentang siapa perlu hidup dan siapa perlu mati.

Tak salah hidup bertuhan, tetapi perlukah kita membunuh untuk tuhan,
kalau semua orang membunuh untuk tuhan masing-masing, siapa yang untung? atau memang saudara suka hidup dalam keadaan daif dan huru hara...
Kalau mahu tolong kaum seagama, buatlah kerja-kerja untuk memanjangkan umur orang yang hidup susah, dan bukannya dengan membunuh orang yang sememangnya hidup tak lama pun di planet ini...

Wan Solehah al-Halbani said...

Salam,

Allah hanyalah Tuhan Yang Maha Esa untuk semua manusia di bumi sejak hari pertama manusia diwujudkan sehingga ke hari kiamat. Tuhan-tuhan yang lain semuanya adalah palsu.

Agama untuk seluruh umat manusia di bumi hanyalah agama Allah. Agama yang lain adalah agama yang palsu.

Muslim dan bukan Muslim hidup dengan aman damai ratusan tahun di bawah empayar-empayar Islam. Manusia cipta tamadun yang maju di bawah kekuasaan-kekuasaan Islam.

Ming dan Manchu adalah empayar-empayar Islam yang wujud hampir seribu tahun di negeri Cina. Turki, Sepanyol, Eropah Timur, Russia, India, Asia Tengah, Afrika Utara berada di bawah kekuasaan-kekuasaan Islam yang berbagai-bagai selama hampir seribu tahun. Semuanya wujud dalam keadaan yang aman, damai dan maju mengikut kadar-kadar tertentu pada masa-masa itu.

Jihad dan Perang hanya berlaku pada permulaan untuk menghapuskan sesebuah kerajaan kafir dan untuk menegakkan sesebuah kerajaan Islam. Selepas itu keadaan akan kembali normal.

Islam tidak memaksa seseorang kafir untuk memeluk agama Islam. Ini adalah perintah Allah. Tetapi Islam memaksa manusia supaya keluar daripada negara kafir dan sistem hidup kafir untuk berada di bawah Negara Islam dan untuk menikmati sistem kehidupan Islam daripada Allah,iaitu Tuhan Yang Maha Esa bagi seluruh umat manusia di bumi.

Sesiapa sahaja - Melayu, Cina,India,Israil,Eropah,Arab, Afrika - boleh dilantik sebagai pemerintah Islam asalkan beragama Islam. Semua orang Islam adalah bersaudara. Cina Islam sayang kepada Melayu Islam,dan Melayu Islam sayang kepada Cina Islam. Tidak wujud perkauman dalam Islam.

Malaysia bukan Negara Islam, Malaysia adalah Negara Kafir yang diperintahka oleh Allah untuk diserang dan diperangi. Melayu Islam akan bergabung dengan Cina Islam untuk memerangi kerajaan Malaysia yang kafir ini.

Sekian, terima kasih.


Paiso Awang Zari

Anonymous said...

Ada tak orang mati datang balik dan cakap dia jumpa tuhan?
Ada sesiapa pernah jumpa tuhan?
Tak salah kalau kita percaya tuhan wujud, tapi kalau kita percaya tuhan itu wujud..maka Buatlah amal dan buatlah perkara baik, yang mana lebih baik daripada bunuh membunuh...
Kalau mahu berjihad, pergilah tolong fakir miskin, rumah yatim, rumah orang tua, derma wang/ tenaga untuk orang susah dan bela nasib orang kampung kita...
Menyalahkan kerajaan, menyalahkan orang kafir, menyalahkan orang lain bukannya dapat menyelesaikan masalah.
Kalau dah kaya dermalah kepada orang kurang berupaya...
Kalau tak berada, kerjalah sungguh-sungguh, jangan buang masa...sumbangkanlah tenaga untuk mereka yang susah.
Bukankah itu mudah dibuat...malah lebih afdal daripada kita benci membenci dan dengki mendengki...